This will be my final post on this blog, as my SSED 307 class is coming to a close. Throughout this class, I have learned so much and I have learned what it truly means to be a meaningful, purposeful, and powerful social studies teacher- which has been the purpose of this blog. As my final post, I want to sum up everything that I have learned this semester and take a look at the many teaching techniques and styles explored throughout this class, highlighting some of the key points.
At the beginning of the semester, we learned the five strands of social studies- history, geography and environmental literacy, civics and government, economics, and culture. As future teachers, we must teach all five of these strands. Then, we discussed how social studies is viewed in the public school system today and this was very shocking to all of us. We learned that schools do not focus on social studies as much or make time for social studies because it is not a tested subject. Even though reading and mathematics dominate the school system because they are tested subjects, social studies is still just as important to teach. We learned that social studies is an essential subject to teach because it prepares students to be active, engaged, and participating citizens of the 21st century.
For the first two weeks of class, we learned about a new way of teaching social studies that we, as a class, had never heard of before. Our professor told us that we had to unlearn the way we were taught social studies in the past, this being a memorization of facts, and relearn this new way of teaching social studies, this being concept-based instruction. Concept-based instruction focuses on the teaching of universal, timeless, abstract, and broad concepts. Concept-based instruction has much more benefit for the students as students are able to learn concepts that can be applied to anything and relate to their lives, versus memorizing facts that they will soon forget. We also learned the building blocks of CBI: facts, topics, concepts, and generalizations.
Over the course of the next few weeks, we broke down concept-based instruction and what it means to teach these concepts in the desire of becoming meaningful, purposeful, and powerful social studies teachers. We learned about generalizations, performance tasks, learning experiences, and guiding questions. Generalizations are sentences that incorporate and relate two or more concepts, and are sentences that the students should be able to understand and possibly derive themselves. Performance tasks are the summative assessments that sum up everything learned in the unit. These performance tasks need to be created before the learning experiences as the learning experiences need to reflect the performance tasks in order to ensure valid assessment. Learning experiences are formative assessments usually that are activities designed to prepare students for the performance tasks. Finally, guiding questions are questions created that you want your students to be able to answer and understand, reflecting your generalizations. These questions can be factual but also need to be conceptual and provocative. Provocative questions result in the highest level of thinking.
During this class, we also learned about the importance of technology integration in the classroom and tools to incorporate this technology. We learned about the SAMR model and TPACK model. The SAMR model shows the different levels of technology integration in the classroom and stands for: Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition. Substitution and augmentation just use technology to support learning, but modification and redefinition transform learning and alter the original task (where true, deep learning takes place). TPACK is a model designed to show what should be implemented in the classroom and stands for: technological, pedagogical, content knowledge. Al three of these things need to be used equally and a successful and intentional teacher should master all three aspects.
Other techniques and areas that we focused on included literacy in the 21st century, the flipped-classroom model, assessment of and for learning, and the NCPTS and their importance. We learned that literacy did not just mean reading and writing but includes environmental, economical, digital etc. The flipped classroom method was a teaching method that we used and describes the flip of a classroom from teaching the content at home and doing the homework in class. We explored the many benefits of the flipped method and got our flipped classroom certification. Assessment of learning describes summative responses (after learning) and assessment for learning describes formative assessments (during learning). As a class, we examined every NCPTS and understood what was required of teachers to master proficiency in every category.
As I have reflected and debriefed on some of the main techniques, topics, skills, and styles that we have learned this semester, I realize just how far I have actually come and how much I have actually learned in this class. All the things mentioned above all describe and define what it means to be a meaningful, purposeful, and powerful social studies instructor. After this class, I feel like I can be this effective and impactful social studies teacher, and it has been great to be able to share what I have learned in this class with the rest of the world through my blog. I have truly enjoyed this class and have found it so important and essential to my teaching journey. Thank you for reading this blog, and I hope you have learned things as well through the sharing of my posts. Goodbye.
I leave you with a summary of what it means to be a meaningful, purposeful, and powerful social studies instructor, according to NCSS: http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/powerfulandpurposeful
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Thursday, April 16, 2015
The Importance of NCPTS Standard 1c
In my last blog post, I wrote about what the NCPTS are, why they are important, and why they should be so essential to teachers and future teachers. This week, I want to look specifically at standard 1c: "Teachers lead the teaching profession." I want to expound on this standard and relate it to some of the important knowledge I gained this week from the Section Chief for K-12 Social Studies at the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Fay Gore.
On Tuesday, my classmates and I had the privilege to speak with Ms. Gore via video chat and ask her deep, challenging questions with a response of profound and enlightening answers. She truly took the time to talk to us and to give us great and helpful advice and thoughts that we can carry with us as we continue on the journey of becoming teachers. One thing from the video talk that really stuck out to me was her mention of the NCSS (National Council for the Social Studies), correlating with the C3 framework that she had a part in creating. I had heard of the NCSS but I did not know what exactly this council stood for, its goals, and why it matters to me as a future teacher. After this talk, I researched the NCSS and its contribution to the C3 framework to further my understanding of what it means for teachers to lead in the teaching profession.
What is the NCSS? According to their website, their goal for Social Studies educators is: "...to teach students the content knowledge, intellectual skills, and civic values necessary for fulfilling the duties of citizenship in a participatory democracy." The key to this statement is teaching students the "duties of citizenship," which is why we have social studies in the first place and is why it is so important to teach social studies in the schools. The NCSS defines Social Studies as: "the integrated study of the social sciences and humanities to promote civic competence." In this definition, Social Studies promotes civic competence which is necessary for those living in the 21st century. NCSS encourages educators to truly teach Social Studies and properly fulfill the duty of promoting civic competence.
Fay Gore served as the Co-chair of the editorial committee for the C3 Framework. The C3 Framework was published by the NCSS in 2013. Before speaking with Ms. Gore, I did not really know what the C3 Framework was and why it was important to Social Studies. The C3 Framework stands for: "College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History." The C3 Framework was created for states to upgrade their social studies standards and for practitioners to strengthen their social studies programs. The goals of the C3 Framework are found on the NCSS page link. Basically, the C3 Framework is designed to prepare students for college, career, and civic life.
Understanding what the NCSS is and how it relates to the C3 Framework is important for educators and is important to the NCPTS standard 1c "Teachers lead in the teaching profession." Teachers have the opportunity to join NCSS and get involved, speak out about standards revision, and advocate for better teaching conditions. A teacher's job does not just mean teaching in the classroom every day for a designated period of time, it is so much more than that, as it requires teachers to lead in the school and teaching profession. As a future teacher, I want to get involved now in researching different ways to get involved in the teaching profession and participate in opportunities when I am a teacher to lead in the profession. It is never too early to start.
On Tuesday, my classmates and I had the privilege to speak with Ms. Gore via video chat and ask her deep, challenging questions with a response of profound and enlightening answers. She truly took the time to talk to us and to give us great and helpful advice and thoughts that we can carry with us as we continue on the journey of becoming teachers. One thing from the video talk that really stuck out to me was her mention of the NCSS (National Council for the Social Studies), correlating with the C3 framework that she had a part in creating. I had heard of the NCSS but I did not know what exactly this council stood for, its goals, and why it matters to me as a future teacher. After this talk, I researched the NCSS and its contribution to the C3 framework to further my understanding of what it means for teachers to lead in the teaching profession.
What is the NCSS? According to their website, their goal for Social Studies educators is: "...to teach students the content knowledge, intellectual skills, and civic values necessary for fulfilling the duties of citizenship in a participatory democracy." The key to this statement is teaching students the "duties of citizenship," which is why we have social studies in the first place and is why it is so important to teach social studies in the schools. The NCSS defines Social Studies as: "the integrated study of the social sciences and humanities to promote civic competence." In this definition, Social Studies promotes civic competence which is necessary for those living in the 21st century. NCSS encourages educators to truly teach Social Studies and properly fulfill the duty of promoting civic competence.
Fay Gore served as the Co-chair of the editorial committee for the C3 Framework. The C3 Framework was published by the NCSS in 2013. Before speaking with Ms. Gore, I did not really know what the C3 Framework was and why it was important to Social Studies. The C3 Framework stands for: "College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History." The C3 Framework was created for states to upgrade their social studies standards and for practitioners to strengthen their social studies programs. The goals of the C3 Framework are found on the NCSS page link. Basically, the C3 Framework is designed to prepare students for college, career, and civic life.
Understanding what the NCSS is and how it relates to the C3 Framework is important for educators and is important to the NCPTS standard 1c "Teachers lead in the teaching profession." Teachers have the opportunity to join NCSS and get involved, speak out about standards revision, and advocate for better teaching conditions. A teacher's job does not just mean teaching in the classroom every day for a designated period of time, it is so much more than that, as it requires teachers to lead in the school and teaching profession. As a future teacher, I want to get involved now in researching different ways to get involved in the teaching profession and participate in opportunities when I am a teacher to lead in the profession. It is never too early to start.
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
NCPTS and their Importance
In the pursuit and goal of this blog being to analyze what it means to be a "meaningful, powerful, and purposeful" social studies teacher, I want to examine the actual guidelines for developing into this type of effective teacher in my blog post this week. The North Carolina State Board of Education has developed a set of six teaching standards that all teachers should adhere to and follow in order to become proficient or accomplished teachers in the 21st century. These standards reflect teacher leadership, the establishment of a respectful environment for a diverse groups of students, teacher knowledge of the content they teach, the pedagogy that the teacher uses, teacher reflection on their practice, and the contribution that the teacher makes toward student academic success.
These standards can be tedious to read through and some can seem of little importance to certain teachers, but essentially, they are all of equal importance and they are all aimed at accomplishing the same goal- producing successful and effective 21st century teachers. Why are these standards so important to teachers teaching in today's school system? According to the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, the NCPTS are: "...the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development." These standards: "...include the skills and knowledge needed for 21st century teaching and learning." (http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/effectiveness-model/ncees/instruments/teach-eval-manual.pdf) The NCPTS are in place to promote and create successful 21st century teachers with the skills and knowledge to create successful 21st century students.
The NCPTS reflect the North Carolina Department of Education's "New Vision of Teaching." This "New Vision of Teaching" lists out what 21st century teachers should know and be able to do in order to ensure meaningful and purposeful teaching and learning. This "New Vision of Teaching" can be found on the pdf site http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/effectiveness-model/ncees/instruments/teach-eval-manual.pdf and I strongly encourage everyone to look at it, as it reflects the NCPTS and describes what teachers should be able to teach, which is not just the core subjects, as there are also 21st century themes and skills incorporated into these subjects.
Using the NCPTS and the "New Vision of Teaching" as the basis, the North Carolina Department of Education has created a diagram that describes the framework for 21st century learning:
These standards can be tedious to read through and some can seem of little importance to certain teachers, but essentially, they are all of equal importance and they are all aimed at accomplishing the same goal- producing successful and effective 21st century teachers. Why are these standards so important to teachers teaching in today's school system? According to the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, the NCPTS are: "...the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development." These standards: "...include the skills and knowledge needed for 21st century teaching and learning." (http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/effectiveness-model/ncees/instruments/teach-eval-manual.pdf) The NCPTS are in place to promote and create successful 21st century teachers with the skills and knowledge to create successful 21st century students.
The NCPTS reflect the North Carolina Department of Education's "New Vision of Teaching." This "New Vision of Teaching" lists out what 21st century teachers should know and be able to do in order to ensure meaningful and purposeful teaching and learning. This "New Vision of Teaching" can be found on the pdf site http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/effectiveness-model/ncees/instruments/teach-eval-manual.pdf and I strongly encourage everyone to look at it, as it reflects the NCPTS and describes what teachers should be able to teach, which is not just the core subjects, as there are also 21st century themes and skills incorporated into these subjects.
Using the NCPTS and the "New Vision of Teaching" as the basis, the North Carolina Department of Education has created a diagram that describes the framework for 21st century learning:
This diagram illustrates all the essential tasks that a teacher needs to accomplish/teach in order to foster 21st century learning. As you can see, there are not just core subjects in this diagram that need to be taught, but there are 21st century themes (global awareness, financial, economic, and civic literacy), learning and innovation skills (critical thinking, problem solving, creativity communication and collaboration), information, media, and technology skills (information and media literacy), and life and career skills (flexibility and adaptability, productivity and accountability, and responsibility and leadership). Teachers must teach all of these skills and knowledge in order to produce 21st century citizens in the students. Underneath the content that teachers must be able to teach rests the platform that builds this content up and makes it stand effectively. Assessments, instruction, professional development, and learning environments are all essential in order to promote this 21st century learning. This diagram, "The New Vision of Teaching," and the NCPTS all reflect each other and are all centered on the same goal- creating meaningful, powerful, and purposeful 21st century teachers.
If we, as teachers, want to succeed and be great 21st century teachers, we must know and uphold the NCPTS, as they are the guidelines for producing the teachers that we need in today's digital society. Their importance is great, as they are the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development. Future teachers need to be able to accomplish all of the tasks that the NCPTS lay out and become proficient in each standard. If teachers are not providing 21st century teaching, how can we expect students to provide the world with 21st century citizenship?
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
The Advantages of Using the Flipped Classroom Method
Previously, my blog posts have been about different teaching styles and techniques that can be incorporated into the classroom to enhance 21st century learning. This week, I want to focus on a whole new method of teaching, as my fellow classmates and I are using this method currently to teach a lesson with- the flipped classroom method. This is a fairly new teaching method and not many teachers in the public school system use it, but it does have its many benefits.
So, what exactly is the flipped classroom method? Basically, it is a method in which the traditional style of teaching (teaching the content in the classroom and giving the application part as homework) is flipped to where content teaching is done at home and applying the content (homework) is done in the classroom. This teaching method is only possible due to the advancement of technology, in which students can watch virtual videos at home of their teacher teaching the content. While this seems unusual and unpractical, with many people pointing out the weaknesses of this teaching style, there are actually many pros and positives that can come out of this teaching method that I would like to look at.
I found a great article that lists 10 reasons flipped classrooms could change education. (http://www.edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2015/03/cosn-2015-10-reasons-flipped-classrooms-could-change-education). This article points out the many positives flipped teaching can have on both the teachers and the students and fully embraces technology in the classroom, reflecting on the model of a 21st century teacher. I am not going address every point but I do want to look at several important benefits that I did not think about before analyzing the flipped classroom method.
One benefit that I feel is very important to the students as well as the teachers is that the flipped classroom method individualizes learning. We all know that every student learns in different ways and at different paces. By allowing the learning to take place at home, students are able to re-watch the video if they'd like, take notes, draw pictures, pause the video at times; whatever works for them and fits their learning style.
Another benefit that reflects off of individualized learning is the maximization of class-time. Since the learning is done at home, there are so many more opportunities and activities to create in the classroom for the students, such as group discussions, enriching learning experiences, critical thinking activities etc. The students already know the content so there is more time and opportunities to apply to content- which is what is important in order to produce well-rounded and engaging students! This is essential for citizens living in the 21st century.
Teachers and students also get excited to use technology for teaching purposes and this allows both the teacher and student to be more engaged in the learning process. The use of technology is simply expected, as well, in our world and generation today, as the article points out: "For students, using technology in and out of the classroom isn't just fun, it's expected, says Fulton." This means that we must fully take advantage of technology in the classroom and use it to its maximum potential, which is why the flipped method is just one way in which we can expand this technology.
The flipped classroom method should not take over the traditional teaching method. Instead, it should accompany the traditional teaching method and both methods should be used to create an engaging, diverse, and well-rounded classroom setting. I will definitely be using some flipped classroom teaching in my classroom but will also focus on traditional teaching as well. As a 21st century meaningful and purposeful instructor, we must take advantage of all the different teaching methods out there and use a variety of methods to fully prepare our students for being citizens of the 21st century.
(This method reflects teaching standard 4.d)
So, what exactly is the flipped classroom method? Basically, it is a method in which the traditional style of teaching (teaching the content in the classroom and giving the application part as homework) is flipped to where content teaching is done at home and applying the content (homework) is done in the classroom. This teaching method is only possible due to the advancement of technology, in which students can watch virtual videos at home of their teacher teaching the content. While this seems unusual and unpractical, with many people pointing out the weaknesses of this teaching style, there are actually many pros and positives that can come out of this teaching method that I would like to look at.
I found a great article that lists 10 reasons flipped classrooms could change education. (http://www.edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2015/03/cosn-2015-10-reasons-flipped-classrooms-could-change-education). This article points out the many positives flipped teaching can have on both the teachers and the students and fully embraces technology in the classroom, reflecting on the model of a 21st century teacher. I am not going address every point but I do want to look at several important benefits that I did not think about before analyzing the flipped classroom method.
One benefit that I feel is very important to the students as well as the teachers is that the flipped classroom method individualizes learning. We all know that every student learns in different ways and at different paces. By allowing the learning to take place at home, students are able to re-watch the video if they'd like, take notes, draw pictures, pause the video at times; whatever works for them and fits their learning style.
Another benefit that reflects off of individualized learning is the maximization of class-time. Since the learning is done at home, there are so many more opportunities and activities to create in the classroom for the students, such as group discussions, enriching learning experiences, critical thinking activities etc. The students already know the content so there is more time and opportunities to apply to content- which is what is important in order to produce well-rounded and engaging students! This is essential for citizens living in the 21st century.
Teachers and students also get excited to use technology for teaching purposes and this allows both the teacher and student to be more engaged in the learning process. The use of technology is simply expected, as well, in our world and generation today, as the article points out: "For students, using technology in and out of the classroom isn't just fun, it's expected, says Fulton." This means that we must fully take advantage of technology in the classroom and use it to its maximum potential, which is why the flipped method is just one way in which we can expand this technology.
The flipped classroom method should not take over the traditional teaching method. Instead, it should accompany the traditional teaching method and both methods should be used to create an engaging, diverse, and well-rounded classroom setting. I will definitely be using some flipped classroom teaching in my classroom but will also focus on traditional teaching as well. As a 21st century meaningful and purposeful instructor, we must take advantage of all the different teaching methods out there and use a variety of methods to fully prepare our students for being citizens of the 21st century.
(This method reflects teaching standard 4.d)
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
Literacy in the 21st Century
As we continue our focus on the 21st century educator, I want to discuss the topic of literacy this week and how the definition has changed over the past few years in regards to what makes a student or person literate in our world today. Most everyone understands the definition of literacy as being able to read and write. This is great and teachers should fulfill the duty of teaching their students proficiently how to be literate in this sense, but is this all students need to be able to do in today's world? In a world that is constantly changing, using technology in almost every aspect of life, and using new skills in the workforce?
Literacy's definition has changed because our world has changed. According to the NCTE (National Council of Teachers of English), literacy is defined as being able to be proficient in these aspects:
Gain proficiency with tools of technology
Develop relationships with others and confront and solve problems collaboratively and cross-culturally
Design and share information for global communities to meet a variety of purposes
Manage, analyze, and synthesize multiple streams of simultaneous information
Create, critique, analyze, and evaluate multimedia texts
Attend to the ethical responsibilities required by these complex environments
These aspects do not just reflect on reading and writing, which is implied in the guidelines, but also shows the expectations for successful and active citizens in the 21st century. As future teachers, we must be able to teach our students these requirements , in order to produce truly literate citizens in our world.
An article I found entitled "Deeper Learning: Twenty-First Century Literacy" takes these points listed above and expounds upon them. For example, it specifies that gaining proficiency in technology means being able to filter what is relevant information on the Internet and being able to use this skill in the workplace. It also takes the two points "Manage, analyze, and synthesize multiple streams of simultaneous information" and "Create, critique, analyze, and evaluate multimedia texts" and explains the significance of students being able to exhibit these skills: "Schools need to be preparing students to masterfully navigate, judge, and create this type of sophisticated communication -- and do so quickly and efficiently."
Literacy in our world has truly changed and is constantly changing. There are many different types of literacy today (environmental, economical, digital etc.) and many diverse types of skills associated with these literacies. What does this new definition of literacy mean for teachers in the 21st century and for the teachers' classrooms? Teachers now have a duty to fulfill in teaching students how to be literate in the 21st century, not merely teaching them how to just read and write. If teachers want to be successful, meaningful, and powerful 21st century educators, they must fulfill this task and embrace it.
Links:
http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/twenty-first-century-literacy-deeper-learning-rebecca-alber
Literacy's definition has changed because our world has changed. According to the NCTE (National Council of Teachers of English), literacy is defined as being able to be proficient in these aspects:
An article I found entitled "Deeper Learning: Twenty-First Century Literacy" takes these points listed above and expounds upon them. For example, it specifies that gaining proficiency in technology means being able to filter what is relevant information on the Internet and being able to use this skill in the workplace. It also takes the two points "Manage, analyze, and synthesize multiple streams of simultaneous information" and "Create, critique, analyze, and evaluate multimedia texts" and explains the significance of students being able to exhibit these skills: "Schools need to be preparing students to masterfully navigate, judge, and create this type of sophisticated communication -- and do so quickly and efficiently."
Literacy in our world has truly changed and is constantly changing. There are many different types of literacy today (environmental, economical, digital etc.) and many diverse types of skills associated with these literacies. What does this new definition of literacy mean for teachers in the 21st century and for the teachers' classrooms? Teachers now have a duty to fulfill in teaching students how to be literate in the 21st century, not merely teaching them how to just read and write. If teachers want to be successful, meaningful, and powerful 21st century educators, they must fulfill this task and embrace it.
Links:
http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/twenty-first-century-literacy-deeper-learning-rebecca-alber
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
TPACK- a New Form of Teaching in the 21st Century
Last week, the focus was on the SAMR model and why the SAMR model was so essential and necessary to the 21st century classroom and how it encouraged concept-based learning. This week, I want to talk about another important teaching model that highlights and captures the era we are living in today called TPACK.TPACK is very essential to all 21st century classrooms, as it uses and takes advantage of all the available resources out there in the world, and creates a model that all teachers should follow in order to be meaningful, purposeful, and powerful teachers in an engaging and student-centered classroom.
So, what exactly is TPACK? TPACK stands for technological pedagogical content knowledge and combines these three elements equally to produce an intentional and effective teaching strategy for 21st century teachers. Teachers must know and understand the content they teach, know how to teach this content, and know how to incorporate technology to support this content and these teaching practices. True and meaningful teaching occurs when a teacher uses all three aspects of TPACK: technological, pedagogical, and content.
Pedagogical and content knowledge were once the only two areas focused on by teachers. As long as teachers knew the content they taught and knew how to teach it, they were effective and purposeful teachers. However, in the 21st century this dynamic has changed due to the increase in technology, the wide availability of technology, and the many resources and opportunities that technology is now offering. We must make this shift and change in our teaching strategies and incorporate technology into our daily teaching for our benefit and for the students' benefit as well. Students in our world today constantly use technology and we must account for this by incorporating a variety of technological devices and sources.
I came across a very fascinating and thought-provoking blog that talks about the evolution in teaching strategies, in regards to TPACK. As mentioned above, content and pedagogical knowledge were the only two aspects in teaching before the 21st century. Then, at the start of the 21st century as technology became more rapid and available, we see a need for technology incorporation in the classrooms and a need for using technology to aid pedagogy. Today, things are just a bit different. With the wide, easily-assessable use of technology, we are seeing technology become part of pedagogy and seeing technology become seamless as it merges with pedagogy. As Meneghini states in the blog (link at bottom), "I will take one step further to say that technology is no longer the focus because pedagogy and technology are actually merging… More and more we see how fast changing technology is part of the world and how that impacts the ways people learn."
As we see technology becoming part of pedagogy, or in other words, seeing the way we teach being teaching through technology, it poses the question: what is the future of TPACK/ the teaching method? Meneghini suggests that: "...the supporting role of technology in learning will only grow and tend to becomes seamless." This means that technology will completely merge with pedagogy and pedagogy will be called "Pedagogy in the Digital World," creating a higher emphasis on pedagogy. Content is still in the picture, but it is not so highly focused on because content can be found and learned through the touch of a button with the empowerment of technology. Technology will become our teaching and learning in all aspects.
TPACK is truly a dominant and significant part of the 21st century classroom, as it requires teachers to equally use technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in order to be meaningful, purposeful, and powerful teachers. TPACK and the SAMR model (mentioned last week) both embrace technology and use technology to its full potential, taking advantage of all the available sources technology has to offer. Technology is impacting how we teach or what strategies we use to teach the content. Truly, if we want to be successful and effective teachers, specifically concept-based social studies teachers, we will embrace and fully use the TPACK and SAMR model in our classrooms and teaching methods.
Here is the awesome blog! http://langwitches.org/blog/2013/12/10/is-technology-shoving-pedagogy-to-the-center-stage-tpack-reviewed/
So, what exactly is TPACK? TPACK stands for technological pedagogical content knowledge and combines these three elements equally to produce an intentional and effective teaching strategy for 21st century teachers. Teachers must know and understand the content they teach, know how to teach this content, and know how to incorporate technology to support this content and these teaching practices. True and meaningful teaching occurs when a teacher uses all three aspects of TPACK: technological, pedagogical, and content.
Pedagogical and content knowledge were once the only two areas focused on by teachers. As long as teachers knew the content they taught and knew how to teach it, they were effective and purposeful teachers. However, in the 21st century this dynamic has changed due to the increase in technology, the wide availability of technology, and the many resources and opportunities that technology is now offering. We must make this shift and change in our teaching strategies and incorporate technology into our daily teaching for our benefit and for the students' benefit as well. Students in our world today constantly use technology and we must account for this by incorporating a variety of technological devices and sources.
I came across a very fascinating and thought-provoking blog that talks about the evolution in teaching strategies, in regards to TPACK. As mentioned above, content and pedagogical knowledge were the only two aspects in teaching before the 21st century. Then, at the start of the 21st century as technology became more rapid and available, we see a need for technology incorporation in the classrooms and a need for using technology to aid pedagogy. Today, things are just a bit different. With the wide, easily-assessable use of technology, we are seeing technology become part of pedagogy and seeing technology become seamless as it merges with pedagogy. As Meneghini states in the blog (link at bottom), "I will take one step further to say that technology is no longer the focus because pedagogy and technology are actually merging… More and more we see how fast changing technology is part of the world and how that impacts the ways people learn."
As we see technology becoming part of pedagogy, or in other words, seeing the way we teach being teaching through technology, it poses the question: what is the future of TPACK/ the teaching method? Meneghini suggests that: "...the supporting role of technology in learning will only grow and tend to becomes seamless." This means that technology will completely merge with pedagogy and pedagogy will be called "Pedagogy in the Digital World," creating a higher emphasis on pedagogy. Content is still in the picture, but it is not so highly focused on because content can be found and learned through the touch of a button with the empowerment of technology. Technology will become our teaching and learning in all aspects.
Here is the awesome blog! http://langwitches.org/blog/2013/12/10/is-technology-shoving-pedagogy-to-the-center-stage-tpack-reviewed/
Thursday, February 26, 2015
SAMR model
To continue our look and study of what concept-based instruction is and how to create meaningful, purposeful, and powerful social studies instruction, we must look at an important element that enhances concept-based instruction and takes learning to the next level. This element is the use of technology in the classroom and how technology can deepen learning among students, not merely just scratching the surface. One model to look at to help explain this integration of technology in the classroom is the SAMR model.
The SAMR model stands for Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition. The SAMR model reflects the progression of technology incorporation in the classroom and how each level advances student engagement and understanding. Substitution is the lowest level of technology incorporation, while redefinition is at the highest level, reflecting deep student involvement and learning.
Now, let's take a look at each level! The first level, substitution, does not broaden or deepen student learning in any way. In other words, substitution is taking a specific task that would require pencil and paper and substituting this task for the use of computers, resulting in no fundamental change in teaching or learning. This form of learning usually reflects a teacher-centered environment, as the teacher is guiding the students' learning and tasks. An example of this would be students printing off a worksheet, filling it out, and passing it back in (https://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model).
The next level does not broaden or transform learning either, rather enhances learning with the use of technology. This level, augmentation, takes learning to the next step by providing students with more immediate feedback and allowing for more student interaction; for example, using Google Sites/Docs that are sharable and immediate. Again, this form of learning stays within the enhancement level and is primarily teacher-centered, although it is more student-centered than substitution.
The next two levels fall within the transformation level. This is where the use of technology deepens student learning, engagement, and involvement and the original task is altered. Modification and redefinition are student-centered, as they require the students to create their own way of learning and generate the questions and discussions. An example of modification in the classroom, would be assigning the students to create an audio recording that would be played in front of an authentic audience. An audience provides students with the responsibility of producing quality work and giving them a personal stake in their work. Redefinition is taking technology to the highest level and changing the performance task while doing this. An example of redefinition is assigning groups of students the task of creating a video documentary that answers an essential question dealing with an important concept, requiring them to contact outside sources for their research. This form of learning is completely student-centered, as the students create the learning and questions and use technology to fully support their learning. https://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model
So, why is the SAMR model so essential to concept-based learning? Concept-based learning can only be effective if it using all available resources and using these resources to deepen and broaden student learning and engagement. Scratching the mere surface with traditional classroom methods, using pencil and paper, is not using all the empowering and enhancing resources that technology allows for. By following this model as future teachers, we can progress through the process of technology incorporation in the classroom as it enhances and transforms teaching and learning. The SAMR model also reflects the NCPTS: Teachers integrate and utilize technology in the classrooms (4d), which is an important element in teaching meaningful and purposeful concept-based instruction.
The site listed at the bottom and throughout the post significantly helped me understand the SAMR model as it explained what each level meant and provided detailed examples for each level. I want to leave one quote from this site that made me ponder the significant impact the use of technology can have on the classroom through the SAMR model: "As one moves along the continuum, computer technology becomes more important in the classroom but at the same time becomes more invisibly woven into the demands of good teaching and learning." Technology does not merely support learning and teaching, it is learning and teaching.
Check out this site! A great resource! https://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model
The SAMR model stands for Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition. The SAMR model reflects the progression of technology incorporation in the classroom and how each level advances student engagement and understanding. Substitution is the lowest level of technology incorporation, while redefinition is at the highest level, reflecting deep student involvement and learning.
Now, let's take a look at each level! The first level, substitution, does not broaden or deepen student learning in any way. In other words, substitution is taking a specific task that would require pencil and paper and substituting this task for the use of computers, resulting in no fundamental change in teaching or learning. This form of learning usually reflects a teacher-centered environment, as the teacher is guiding the students' learning and tasks. An example of this would be students printing off a worksheet, filling it out, and passing it back in (https://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model).
The next level does not broaden or transform learning either, rather enhances learning with the use of technology. This level, augmentation, takes learning to the next step by providing students with more immediate feedback and allowing for more student interaction; for example, using Google Sites/Docs that are sharable and immediate. Again, this form of learning stays within the enhancement level and is primarily teacher-centered, although it is more student-centered than substitution.
The next two levels fall within the transformation level. This is where the use of technology deepens student learning, engagement, and involvement and the original task is altered. Modification and redefinition are student-centered, as they require the students to create their own way of learning and generate the questions and discussions. An example of modification in the classroom, would be assigning the students to create an audio recording that would be played in front of an authentic audience. An audience provides students with the responsibility of producing quality work and giving them a personal stake in their work. Redefinition is taking technology to the highest level and changing the performance task while doing this. An example of redefinition is assigning groups of students the task of creating a video documentary that answers an essential question dealing with an important concept, requiring them to contact outside sources for their research. This form of learning is completely student-centered, as the students create the learning and questions and use technology to fully support their learning. https://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model
So, why is the SAMR model so essential to concept-based learning? Concept-based learning can only be effective if it using all available resources and using these resources to deepen and broaden student learning and engagement. Scratching the mere surface with traditional classroom methods, using pencil and paper, is not using all the empowering and enhancing resources that technology allows for. By following this model as future teachers, we can progress through the process of technology incorporation in the classroom as it enhances and transforms teaching and learning. The SAMR model also reflects the NCPTS: Teachers integrate and utilize technology in the classrooms (4d), which is an important element in teaching meaningful and purposeful concept-based instruction.
The site listed at the bottom and throughout the post significantly helped me understand the SAMR model as it explained what each level meant and provided detailed examples for each level. I want to leave one quote from this site that made me ponder the significant impact the use of technology can have on the classroom through the SAMR model: "As one moves along the continuum, computer technology becomes more important in the classroom but at the same time becomes more invisibly woven into the demands of good teaching and learning." Technology does not merely support learning and teaching, it is learning and teaching.
Check out this site! A great resource! https://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)